Given the recent industry-wide transition toward 1.6T Ethernet deployments for AI clusters, how do Broadcom's (AVGO) current production yields and order backlogs for the Tomahawk 5 and Jericho3-AI chipsets compare to competitors like Marvell, and what does this imply for the company's networking revenue growth in the second half of fiscal 2026?

The transition to 1.6T Ethernet in the second half of fiscal 2026 represents a critical inflection point for the networking sector, with Broadcom (AVGO) maintaining a dominant first-mover advantage over Marvell (MRVL). Broadcom’s lead is underpinned by its superior manufacturing scale, a more mature 3nm roadmap, and a massive, front-loaded order backlog that provides high visibility into H2 2026 revenue. 🏗️ Chipset Comparison: Performance & Market Readiness Broadcom’s strategy centers on a "three-chip" architecture (Tomahawk, Jericho, and Ramon) that currently defines the industry standard for high-radix AI fabrics. Broadcom Tomahawk 5 & 6: The Tomahawk 5 (51.2 Tbps) is currently the workhorse of 800G deployments. However, the Tomahawk 6 (102.4 Tbps) is the primary catalyst for the 1.6T transition. It is the first 102.4T single-chip switch on the market, enabling "flat" network topologies for clusters of up to 1,000,000 XPUs. Broadcom Jericho3-AI: Specifically designed for AI training, this chipset competes directly with NVIDIA’s InfiniBand by offering deep buffers and "perfect" load balancing. Its successor, Jericho 4, is already sampling to support the increased bandwidth requirements of H2 2026. Marvell Teralynx 10 & Nova: Marvell’s Teralynx 10 (51.2 Tbps) is a formidable competitor in the 800G space, but the company’s 1.6T strategy relies heavily on its Nova 1.6T PAM4 DSP. While Marvell leads in optical DSP market share, it trails Broadcom in high-end switch silicon, where it currently holds approximately 15% to 20% market share compared to Broadcom’s 70% to 80% . 📈 Production Yields & Order Backlogs Yield maturity and backlog depth are the primary differentiators heading into the 1.6T ramp. Yield Maturity: Broadcom’s Tomahawk 5 and Jericho3-AI are mature 5nm products with optimized yields, allowing for aggressive volume scaling. The Tomahawk 6 is ramping on TSMC’s 3nm process; while 3nm yields are generally lower than 5nm, Broadcom’s "flawless execution" track record suggests it is reaching commercial viability faster than Marvell, which is still transitioning its lead custom ASIC programs to 3nm. Backlog Visibility: Broadcom: Reported a staggering $73B AI-specific backlog as of late 2025, with over $10B specifically allocated to AI networking switches. This backlog is expected to be delivered over the next 18 months , providing a "floor" for H2 2026 revenue. Marvell: Boasts a $75B lifetime revenue funnel, but its current pipeline is more concentrated, with roughly $7.5B (10%) in active design wins. Marvell has noted that purchase orders already cover its full fiscal 2027 (calendar 2026) forecast for its lead hyperscaler custom program. 🔮 Implications for H2 Fiscal 2026 Revenue Growth The second half of fiscal 2026 is projected to be a "growth inflection" period for Broadcom, driven by the massive refresh cycle from 800G to 1.6T. Revenue Acceleration: Analysts project Broadcom’s AI-related revenue to reach nearly $50B in FY2026, a 150% YoY surge. Networking revenue specifically is expected to grow by 40% or more as Tomahawk 6 moves into full production. Custom ASIC Synergy: Broadcom’s networking growth is amplified by its custom XPU wins with Google, Meta, and OpenAI. As these customers deploy "mega-clusters," they are co-purchasing Broadcom’s 1.6T switching fabric to ensure interconnect efficiency. Margin Dynamics: While the high mix of custom ASICs may cause a -100 bps to -200 bps compression in gross margins, the sheer volume of the 1.6T ramp is expected to drive record absolute EBITDA. Competitive Positioning: Marvell is expected to see a "snap-back" year with revenue growth of 40% in fiscal 2026, but its growth is more dependent on the recovery of enterprise/carrier segments, whereas Broadcom’s growth is almost entirely decoupled from legacy cycles and tethered to the AI infrastructure supercycle.

Following the recent consolidation of the VMware product portfolio into subscription-based bundles, to what extent has Broadcom (AVGO) successfully converted the legacy perpetual license base, and what are the specific risks to customer retention as these contracts come up for renewal in the current macroeconomic environment?

Broadcom (AVGO) has executed a rapid and aggressive transition of the VMware business model since its acquisition in late 2023. By February 2026, the company has largely completed the structural phase of this pivot, moving from a fragmented catalog of over 8,000 SKUs to a consolidated, subscription-only portfolio centered on VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) and VMware vSphere Foundation (VVF). Conversion Success: The "Global 10,000" Strategy Broadcom’s primary objective was to convert the high-value "Global 10,000" (G10K) customers to full-stack private cloud subscriptions. Data from fiscal year 2025 indicates significant progress in this segment: Adoption Rates: As of mid-2025, Broadcom reported that 87% of its top 10,000 customers had already adopted the VCF bundle. This high conversion rate among the largest accounts has been a primary driver of revenue stability. Revenue Growth: For the full fiscal year 2025, Broadcom’s infrastructure software segment (which includes VMware) generated $27B in revenue, representing a 26% year-over-year increase. Profitability & Margins: The software group achieved an operating margin of 78% in Q4 2025, up from 72% a year prior. This was driven by the elimination of low-margin perpetual support contracts and the reduction of the partner ecosystem. Booking Momentum: Q4 2025 bookings exceeded $10.4B , compared to $8.2B in the previous year, suggesting that while the customer count may be consolidating, the contract value per customer is increasing. Specific Risks to Customer Retention While the financial metrics show success in the top-tier segment, the "long tail" of smaller and mid-market customers presents a different risk profile as they reach their first major renewal cycles in 2026. 1. The "Broadcom Tax" and Price Shocks The shift to bundling has resulted in significant cost increases for customers who previously used only a subset of VMware’s tools (e.g., just vSphere without NSX or vSAN). Enterprises have reported price hikes ranging from 30% to 70% , with extreme cases for smaller organizations reaching 600% to 1,500% due to the loss of legacy discounts and the enforcement of new minimums. Broadcom now enforces a minimum of 16 cores per CPU and, in some regions, a general minimum purchase of 72 cores per order, effectively pricing out smaller deployments. 2. Operational and Support Friction Broadcom’s decision to cut thousands of smaller channel partners has disrupted the support model for the mid-market. Support Quality: Surveys in early 2026 indicate that 78% of customers are concerned about the quality and responsiveness of support following the integration. Late Penalties: Broadcom introduced a 20% surcharge for renewals made after the contract anniversary date, a move that has further strained customer relations. 3. Competitive Displacement and "Calculated Retreat" The 2026 renewal cycle is the first time many enterprises have had sufficient lead time to evaluate and test alternatives. Proof of Concept (PoC) Activity: Gartner estimates that by 2026, 50% of enterprises will have initiated PoCs for alternative platforms, up from only 10% in 2024. Market Share Shifts: While VMware remains dominant, Nutanix (AHV) and Microsoft (Hyper-V/Azure Stack) are seeing increased adoption for new workloads. Nutanix's market share in hyperconverged infrastructure is projected to reach 8-10% by 2027 as customers move away from the "Broadcom stack." Macroeconomic Environment & CFO Scrutiny In the current environment of high interest rates and disciplined IT spending, the "all-or-nothing" nature of VCF bundles is facing intense scrutiny from Chief Financial Officers (CFOs). Budget Reprioritization: With Broadcom’s AI semiconductor business projected to reach $8.2B in Q1 2026 alone, the company has the financial cushion to lose smaller VMware accounts. However, for the customers, the "forced upgrade" to VCF is often viewed as a "technical debt" tax that competes with AI and digital transformation budgets. Repatriation Trends: Broadcom is positioning VCF as a way to "repatriate" workloads from expensive public clouds (AWS/Azure) to private clouds. Success in this narrative is critical for retention; if customers do not see the "private cloud" value proposition, they are more likely to migrate directly to cloud-native containers (Kubernetes) rather than renewing VMware.

As hyperscalers increasingly explore diversified custom silicon roadmaps, what is the projected impact on Broadcom's (AVGO) ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) margins if major partners like Google or Meta move toward more internal design autonomy or alternative foundry partnerships over the next 12 to 18 months?

The shift toward diversified custom silicon roadmaps by hyperscalers presents a dual-track impact on Broadcom’s (AVGO) financial profile. While the volume of Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) shipments is reaching historic levels, the increasing mix of these products is exerting downward pressure on Broadcom’s consolidated gross margins. 1. Strategic Margin Compression and Revenue Mix Broadcom’s custom AI accelerators (XPUs), including Google’s Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) and Meta’s Training and Inference Accelerators (MTIA), carry a lower gross margin profile compared to the company’s traditional high-margin switching silicon and infrastructure software. Consolidated Margin Dilution: Management has guided for a 100 basis point sequential decline in non-GAAP gross margin for Q1 FY2026, projected to reach approximately 76.9% . This is a direct result of the "higher mix of AI revenue," which reached $6.5B in Q4 FY2025. ASIC vs. Corporate Average: While Broadcom’s corporate gross margins have historically averaged 75.1% , custom ASIC margins are estimated to be significantly lower, often in the 45% to 55% range. As AI revenue is projected to grow over 150% YoY in FY2026, the dilutive effect on the total corporate margin is expected to persist over the next 18 months. Operating Leverage Offset: Despite gross margin pressure, Broadcom’s operating margins remain resilient due to extreme scale. The company reported an operating margin of 40.8% in late 2025, suggesting that the absolute dollar growth in profit is offsetting the percentage-point compression. 2. Hyperscaler Autonomy and Design Friction The move toward "internal design autonomy" by Google and Meta is a nuanced threat. While both firms are hiring internal silicon teams, the technical complexity of 3nm and 2nm nodes maintains Broadcom’s relevance. Google (TPU v7 "Ironwood"): Broadcom remains the primary partner for Google’s seventh-generation TPU. Google’s TPU program alone is projected to generate over $10B for Broadcom in 2025. However, reports of Google partnering with MediaTek for certain next-gen TPU components indicate a strategic push to diversify suppliers and potentially squeeze Broadcom’s pricing power. Meta (MTIA "Santa Barbara"): Meta is aggressively scaling its MTIA program, with shipments expected to double by 2026. Broadcom is the co-designer for these chips, benefiting from Meta’s projected $115B to $135B CapEx budget for 2026. The "Value-Add" Moat: Broadcom’s primary defense against full autonomy is its proprietary Intellectual Property (IP) in SerDes (high-speed data transfer) and HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) integration. Even if a hyperscaler designs the "core" logic, they often still license Broadcom’s "connective tissue" IP, which carries higher margins than the physical chip assembly. 3. Competitive and Foundry Dynamics The next 12 to 18 months will see increased competition for the "middleman" role in custom silicon. Alternative Partnerships: Marvell Technology remains the primary competitor for custom ASIC slots (notably with Amazon and Microsoft). Additionally, the emergence of MediaTek as a potential Google partner introduces a new pricing floor that could force Broadcom to accept lower margins to retain its 75% market share in custom AI accelerators. Direct Foundry Access: While hyperscalers could theoretically go direct to TSMC, the yield risks and packaging complexities (CoWoS) at 3nm make a "pure internal" roadmap high-risk. Broadcom’s status as a top-tier TSMC customer provides it with preferential wafer allocation, a critical advantage during supply-constrained periods. 4. 12-18 Month Outlook and Backlog Visibility Broadcom enters 2026 with unprecedented visibility, which may mitigate the impact of individual customer design shifts. Backlog Strength: The company has disclosed an AI-specific backlog of $73B to be recognized over the next 18 months. This suggests that even if Google or Meta diversify their roadmaps, the immediate revenue impact is capped by existing multi-year contracts. Margin Floor: Analysts expect Broadcom’s gross margin to find a "floor" in the low 70% range by late 2026 as the AI mix stabilizes. Customer Concentration Risk: A significant portion of AI revenue remains tied to a small group of customers. Any decision by Google to shift a meaningful percentage of TPU v8/v9 orders to MediaTek or internal teams would represent a high-impact risk to Broadcom’s long-term growth trajectory.

Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) Stock Price & AI Analysis

GoAI Score

Sign in to unlock

Valuation

50Fair Value

Sentiment

100Bullish

Risk

71Low Risk

Momentum

53Neutral

Institutional-Grade Intelligence

🏆PRO

Actionable Intelligence

AI-driven stance, execution logic & risk thresholds

Catalyst Roadmap

Event timeline with expected impact & market context

Deep Insights

Fact-checked analysis & score logic breakdown

Financial Statements

Margin Trends

Gross

67.8%▲4.7pp

Revenue after COGS

Operating

39.9%▲13.8pp

After operating expenses

Net

36.2%▲24.8pp

Bottom-line profitability

Gross Margin

Operating Margin

Net Margin

Valuation Snapshot

P/E Ratio

73.9

Price vs earnings

EV/EBITDA

50.6

Enterprise value

FCF Yield

1.6%

Cash generation

Earnings Yield

1.4%

Inverse of P/E

Capital Efficiency

19

GoAI Quality ScoreStrong

ROEReturn on Equity

28.4%Strong

ROAReturn on Assets

13.5%Strong

ROICReturn on Invested Capital

16.4%Strong

Financial Health

Current RatioHealthy

1.71

Short-term solvency (>1.5)

Net Debt / EBITDAManageable

1.41x

Debt repayment capacity (<3x)

Income QualityStrong

1.19

Cash backs earnings (>1)

Revenue & Profitability

Revenue

Net Income

Net Loss

Income Statement

Metric	FY2025	FY2024	FY2023	FY2022	FY2021
Revenue	$63.89B	$51.57B	$35.82B	$33.20B	$27.45B
Gross Profit	$43.29B	$32.51B	$24.69B	$22.09B	$16.84B
Gross Margin	67.8%	63.0%	68.9%	66.5%	61.4%
Operating Income	$25.48B	$13.46B	$16.21B	$14.22B	$8.52B
Net Income	$23.13B	$5.89B	$14.08B	$11.49B	$6.74B
Net Margin	36.2%	11.4%	39.3%	34.6%	24.5%
EPS	$4.91	$1.27	$3.39	$2.74	$1.57

Average Price Target

$443.72▲ 33.4% Upside

Past 12 Months

12 Month Forecast

Based on 50 Wall Street analysts offering 12 month price targets for Broadcom Inc., the average price target is $443.72, with a high forecast of $510.00 and a low forecast of $335.00. The average price target represents a 33.4% increase from the current price of $332.65.

Highest

$510.00

Average

$443.72

Lowest

$335.00

Rating Distribution

Strong Buy

0

0%

Buy

53

93%

Hold

4

7%

Sell

0

0%

Strong Sell

0

0%

Recent Analyst Ratings

FirmActionRatingDate

Citigroup● Maintain

Buy

2026-02-17

Wells Fargo▲ Upgrade

Equal Weight→Overweight

2026-01-15

Mizuho● Maintain

Outperform

2026-01-09

Truist Securities● Maintain

Buy

2025-12-19

UBS● Maintain

Buy

2025-12-15

Bernstein● Maintain

Outperform

2025-12-12

B of A Securities● Maintain

Buy

2025-12-12

JP Morgan● Maintain

Overweight

2025-12-12

Keybanc● Maintain

Overweight

2025-12-12

Citigroup● Maintain

Buy

2025-12-12

Earnings History & Surprises

BEAT RATE

94%

Last 18 quarters

AVG SURPRISE

+2.3%

EPS vs Estimate

BEATS / MISSES

17/0

1 met exactly

LATEST EPS

$1.95

Q4 '25

QUARTERLY EPS TREND

Estimated

Beat

Miss

QUARTERLY DETAIL

Q4 '25

+4.3%

$1.95 vs $1.87

Q3 '25

+1.8%

$1.69 vs $1.66

Q2 '25

+0.6%

$1.58 vs $1.57

Q1 '25

+6.0%

$1.60 vs $1.51

Q4 '24

+2.9%

$1.42 vs $1.38

Q3 '24

+1.6%

$1.24 vs $1.22

Q2 '24

+0.9%

$1.10 vs $1.09

Q1 '24

+6.1%

$1.10 vs $1.04

Q4 '23

+0.9%

$1.11 vs $1.10

Q3 '23

+1.0%

$1.05 vs $1.04

Q2 '23

+2.0%

$1.03 vs $1.01

Q1 '23

+1.0%

$1.03 vs $1.02

Investor Q&A

Top questions investors are asking about Broadcom Inc.

3 Questions

Ask GoAI anything about Broadcom Inc.

Latest News

No news available