Following GE Aerospace’s recent Q4 2025 earnings release, how do the projected 2026 LEAP engine delivery volumes and the current resolution status of durability-related shop visit constraints impact the company’s ability to meet its Free Cash Flow conversion targets for the next four quarters?

Following GE Aerospace’s Q4 2025 earnings release on January 22, 2026, the company’s ability to meet its $8.0B – $8.4B Free Cash Flow (FCF) target for 2026—representing a conversion rate "well above 100%"—is fundamentally tied to the scaling of LEAP aftermarket services and the stabilization of new engine delivery margins. 📦 2026 LEAP Delivery Projections & Margin Dynamics GE Aerospace has projected a ~15% increase in LEAP engine deliveries for 2026, following a record 1,802 units delivered in 2025 (a 28% YoY increase). FCF Impact: While higher delivery volumes typically create a working capital drag due to inventory build, GE is transitioning LEAP original equipment (OE) toward "unit profitability." The 2026 guidance assumes that the negative "mix" impact from higher OE deliveries will be increasingly offset by manufacturing productivity and price realization. Inventory Management: In Q4 2025, FCF was partially tempered by inventory growth intended to support the 2026 ramp. Management expects this inventory headwind to moderate over the next four quarters as the "Flight Deck" operating model improves supplier linearity. 🛠️ Durability Resolution & Shop Visit Constraints The resolution of durability-related constraints is the primary lever for GE’s high-margin services growth, which is expected to rise in the "mid-teens" for 2026. Capacity Expansion: GE is executing a $1B+ global MRO investment, with $500M specifically allocated to LEAP. This is designed to double internal LEAP shop visit capacity over the medium term. Durability Kits: The rollout of "durability kits"—including the Reverse Bleed System (RBS) and improved High-Pressure Turbine (HPT) blades—is critical. RBS kits are already being integrated into the LEAP-1A fleet, with LEAP-1B (737 MAX) kits scheduled for deployment in H1 2026 . Throughput Improvements: Internal LEAP shop visits are projected to grow 25% in 2026. Turnaround times (TAT) improved by >10% in Q4 2025, suggesting that the "bottleneck" phase of the durability crisis is shifting toward a "throughput" phase, which is highly accretive to cash flow. 📈 FCF Conversion Outlook (Next Four Quarters) GE Aerospace’s FCF target of $8.0B – $8.4B relies on a specific sequence of events over the next year: 1. Q1–Q2 2026: Focus on clearing the "work-in-process" (WIP) inventory from 2025 and ramping the LEAP-1B durability retrofits. Cash flow may see typical seasonal softness but will be supported by strong spare parts demand (projected mid-teens growth). 2. Q3–Q4 2026: Realization of higher shop visit volumes as expanded MRO capacity comes online. The company expects to benefit from "higher work scopes" per visit as the LEAP fleet matures, which drives higher revenue per shop visit and supports the >100% conversion target. ⚠️ Risks & Uncertainties Supply Chain Linearity: While material input from priority suppliers rose 40% in 2025, any regression in casting or forging availability could delay shop visit completions, deferring cash collection. GE9X Headwinds: Management noted that GE9X program losses are expected to double in 2026 due to the 777X delay and ongoing testing. This creates a structural headwind that the LEAP services business must "out-earn" to hit the FCF floor.

Given the persistent supply chain bottlenecks in high-temperature alloys observed in early 2026, what specific risks do these constraints pose to GE Aerospace’s margin expansion guidance, and how should investors adjust valuation models for the Commercial Engines & Services segment?

The persistent supply chain constraints in high-temperature alloys (HTAs)—specifically nickel-based superalloys and rhenium-heavy components—represent a significant headwind for GE Aerospace’s Commercial Engines & Services (CES) segment in 2026. These materials are critical for the "hot section" components of modern turbofans, such as the LEAP and GE9X, which must withstand extreme thermal stress to maintain fuel efficiency. Impact on Margin Expansion Guidance GE Aerospace has historically guided for aggressive margin expansion in its CES segment, driven by the transition from low-margin Original Equipment (OE) deliveries to high-margin aftermarket services. However, HTA bottlenecks disrupt this trajectory through three primary mechanisms: 1. Aftermarket Throughput Constraints: The CES segment derives the majority of its operating profit from shop visits and spare parts. HTAs are essential for life-limited parts (LLPs) replaced during overhauls. If alloy shortages delay the production of turbine blades or nozzles, "Time on Wing" for airlines increases, but GE’s ability to recognize high-margin service revenue is deferred. This creates a -100 to -200 basis point drag on projected operating margins due to under-absorption of fixed costs in maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) facilities. 2. Input Cost Inflation: Persistent scarcity typically leads to price escalation in raw materials and specialized casting/forging processes. While GE utilizes long-term agreements (LTAs) and "raw material pass-through" clauses in many contracts, these often have a lag. In a high-inflation environment for specialized alloys, the immediate impact is a compression of the gross margin, potentially offsetting the 20% to 25% operating margin targets set for the 2025–2026 period. 3. OE Delivery Penalties: While OE is lower margin, delivery delays for engines like the LEAP-1A/1B can trigger liquidated damages or "concessions" to airframers (Airbus and Boeing). These penalties flow directly to the bottom line, further eroding the segment's profitability. Valuation Model Adjustments for CES Investors and analysts should consider recalibrating valuation models to account for a "shifted" rather than "lost" earnings profile, while increasing the risk premium associated with supply chain fragility. Revenue Recognition Timing: Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) models should shift a portion of the $30B+ projected CES revenue from 2026 into 2027 and 2028. This reflects the reality that while the order book remains robust, the "conversion-to-cash" cycle is lengthening due to component shortages. EBIT Margin Normalization: Rather than assuming a linear expansion toward 23% margins, models should incorporate a "plateau" effect in 2026. A sensitivity analysis should be performed where margins are held flat or experience a -1.5% contraction to test the floor of the company's valuation. Inventory and Working Capital: Analysts should increase the "Change in Working Capital" assumptions. GE may be forced to carry higher safety stocks of raw materials or "work-in-process" (WIP) inventory (engines waiting for a single HTA component), which reduces Free Cash Flow (FCF) conversion. A target FCF conversion of 90% to 100% of Net Income may be more realistic than the historical 100%+ during this bottleneck period. WACC and Risk Premium: Given the geopolitical sensitivity of alloy sourcing (e.g., reliance on specific regions for cobalt or titanium), a 25-50 basis point increase in the Equity Risk Premium (ERP) within the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) calculation may be appropriate to reflect heightened operational uncertainty. Strategic Mitigants and Monitoring The severity of these risks depends on GE’s internal "vertical integration" efforts. GE’s investment in Additive Manufacturing (3D printing) and its proprietary Ceramic Matrix Composites (CMCs) may provide a long-term hedge against traditional alloy bottlenecks. However, in the 2026 window, the reliance on traditional casting for high-pressure turbine components remains the primary bottleneck. Investors should monitor "Inventory Turns" and "MRO Backlog" as leading indicators of whether these constraints are easing or intensifying.

In light of the 2026 defense budget appropriations and recent geopolitical shifts, how will the expected ramp-up in GE Aerospace’s Defense and Systems orders provide a hedge against potential delivery delays in the Boeing 777X program and its associated GE9X engine production?

The expected ramp-up in GE Aerospace’s Defense and Systems segment serves as a critical strategic and financial stabilizer for the company in 2026. As the Boeing 777X program faces further certification delays and technical hurdles with the GE9X engine, the defense business provides a high-visibility revenue stream backed by the FY2026 U.S. Defense Budget and escalating international demand. 🛡️ Defense Segment: Geopolitical and Budgetary Tailwinds The FY2026 Defense Appropriations Act, which provides $839.2B in discretionary funding, positions GE Aerospace as a primary beneficiary of the U.S. military's modernization cycle. U.S. Program Momentum: GE has secured a $5B contract from the U.S. Air Force for F110 engines and support. The 2026 budget also allocates $3.1B for 24 F-15EX Eagle II fighters (powered by GE F110s) and $3.5B for Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD/F-47) R&D, where GE’s advanced propulsion technologies are central. International Expansion: Geopolitical shifts have accelerated Foreign Military Sales (FMS). GE recently clinched an order for 113 F404 engines for India’s Tejas Mk1A and signed a landmark industrial deal with Saudi Arabia to localize F110 MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul) capabilities. Segment Performance: In 2025, Defense & Propulsion orders surged 19% (with a 61% spike in Q4 alone), while segment operating profit grew 22% to $1.3B . ✈️ Boeing 777X and GE9X: Production and Delivery Risks The Boeing 777X program remains a source of operational friction. Initially targeted for earlier service, first deliveries are now pushed to 2027. Technical Hurdles: A "durability issue" involving a seal in the GE9X engine was identified in late 2025. While GE validated a fix in January 2026, the program is expected to see "doubled losses" in 2026 as it navigates the final, high-cost certification phase. Delivery Lag: Boeing’s production-standard flight for the 777X is not scheduled until April 2026. This delay defers the high-volume delivery revenue GE anticipated from its widebody flagship, creating a temporary vacuum in its commercial equipment growth. ⚖️ The Hedge Mechanism: Offsetting Commercial Volatility The defense ramp-up provides a structural hedge against these commercial widebody delays through three primary channels: 1. Revenue Diversification: While the LEAP engine (commercial narrowbody) remains GE's largest driver, the defense segment’s mid-to-high single-digit revenue growth forecast for 2026 provides a non-cyclical buffer. 2. Margin Protection: Defense contracts often carry long-term service agreements with predictable, high-margin aftermarket revenue. This helps maintain GE’s projected 2026 operating profit of $9.85B – $10.25B despite GE9X headwinds. 3. Backlog Stability: GE’s total backlog has reached a record $190B . The rapid conversion of defense orders into revenue mitigates the "certification drag" of the 777X, ensuring the company meets its 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $7.10 – $7.40 . ⚠️ Risks and Uncertainties Despite the defense hedge, GE Aerospace faces persistent challenges: Supply Chain Fragility: Material availability and labor shortages continue to cap production upside across both segments. Execution Risk: Any further technical snags in the GE9X certification process could extend losses beyond 2026. Budgetary Shifts: While the 2026 budget is robust, future shifts in U.S. fiscal policy or a de-escalation of regional conflicts could temper the current defense order momentum.

GE Aerospace (GE) Stock Price & AI Analysis

GoAI Score

Sign in to unlock

Valuation

50Fair Value

Sentiment

75Bullish

Risk

65Low Risk

Momentum

94Positive

Institutional-Grade Intelligence

🏆PRO

Actionable Intelligence

AI-driven stance, execution logic & risk thresholds

Catalyst Roadmap

Event timeline with expected impact & market context

Deep Insights

Fact-checked analysis & score logic breakdown

Financial Statements

Margin Trends

Gross

36.8%▼0.4pp

Revenue after COGS

Operating

19.1%▲1.7pp

After operating expenses

Net

19.0%▲2.0pp

Bottom-line profitability

Gross Margin

Operating Margin

Net Margin

Valuation Snapshot

P/E Ratio

37.8

Price vs earnings

EV/EBITDA

27.9

Enterprise value

FCF Yield

2.2%

Cash generation

Earnings Yield

2.6%

Inverse of P/E

Capital Efficiency

19

GoAI Quality ScoreStrong

ROEReturn on Equity

46.6%Strong

ROAReturn on Assets

6.7%Strong

ROICReturn on Invested Capital

8.1%Fair

Financial Health

Current RatioAdequate

1.04

Short-term solvency (>1.5)

Net Debt / EBITDAManageable

0.67x

Debt repayment capacity (<3x)

Income QualityFair

0.98

Cash backs earnings (>1)

Revenue & Profitability

Revenue

Net Income

Net Loss

Income Statement

Metric	FY2025	FY2024	FY2023	FY2022	FY2021
Revenue	$45.85B	$38.70B	$35.35B	$29.14B	$56.47B
Gross Profit	$16.89B	$14.39B	$12.41B	$10.15B	$13.09B
Gross Margin	36.8%	37.2%	35.1%	34.8%	23.2%
Operating Income	$8.77B	$6.76B	$4.72B	$3.60B	$1.06B
Net Income	$8.70B	$6.56B	$9.48B	$336.00M	-$6.34B
Net Margin	19.0%	16.9%	26.8%	1.2%	-11.2%
EPS	$8.16	$6.04	$8.44	$0.04	-$6.16

Average Price Target

$391.50▲ 14.1% Upside

Past 12 Months

12 Month Forecast

Based on 50 Wall Street analysts offering 12 month price targets for GE Aerospace, the average price target is $391.50, with a high forecast of $425.00 and a low forecast of $374.00. The average price target represents a 14.1% increase from the current price of $343.22.

Highest

$425.00

Average

$391.50

Lowest

$374.00

Rating Distribution

Strong Buy

0

0%

Buy

23

68%

Hold

11

32%

Sell

0

0%

Strong Sell

0

0%

Recent Analyst Ratings

FirmActionRatingDate

JP Morgan● Maintain

Overweight

2026-01-26

UBS● Maintain

Buy

2026-01-23

Citigroup● Maintain

Buy

2026-01-23

UBS● Maintain

Buy

2026-01-15

Citigroup● Maintain

Buy

2026-01-13

B of A Securities● Maintain

Buy

2025-10-27

JP Morgan● Maintain

Overweight

2025-10-27

UBS● Maintain

Buy

2025-10-22

RBC Capital● Maintain

Outperform

2025-10-22

Barclays● Maintain

Overweight

2025-07-23

Earnings History & Surprises

BEAT RATE

94%

Last 18 quarters

AVG SURPRISE

+27.5%

EPS vs Estimate

BEATS / MISSES

17/1

Last 18 quarters

LATEST EPS

$1.57

Q1 '26

QUARTERLY EPS TREND

Estimated

Beat

Miss

QUARTERLY DETAIL

Q1 '26

+9.8%

$1.57 vs $1.43

Q4 '25

+13.7%

$1.66 vs $1.46

Q3 '25

+16.1%

$1.66 vs $1.43

Q2 '25

+17.3%

$1.49 vs $1.27

Q1 '25

+25.7%

$1.32 vs $1.05

Q4 '24

+1.8%

$1.15 vs $1.13

Q3 '24

+21.2%

$1.20 vs $0.99

Q2 '24

+15.3%

$0.82 vs $0.71

Q1 '24

+13.2%

$1.03 vs $0.91

Q4 '23

+46.4%

$0.82 vs $0.56

Q3 '23

+47.8%

$0.68 vs $0.46

Q2 '23

+107.7%

$0.27 vs $0.13

Investor Q&A

Top questions investors are asking about GE Aerospace

3 Questions

Ask GoAI anything about GE Aerospace

Latest News

No news available